The effectiveness of bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in the management of class III skeletal malocclusion in children aged 11–14 years compared with an untreated control group: A multicentre two-arm parallel randomised

Post time 2024-6-11 15:35:52

journal：Journal of Orthodontics

Authors：Nicky Mandall; Wesam Aleid; Richard Cousley; Edith Curran; Susi Caldwell; Andrew DiBiase; Fiona Dyer; Simon Littlewood; Spencer Nute; Sarah Jayne Campbell; Simon Atkins; Sherif Bayoumi; Vyomesh Bhatt; Paul Chambers; Nicholas Goodger; Claire Bates; Ovais Malik; David Waring; Paul Bassett

Published date：--

DOI：10.1177/14653125241255139

PDF link：https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14653125241255139

Article link：http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14653125241255139

Article Source：SAGE Publications。

Remark：

Post time 2024-6-11 15:35:53

: This post has been completed
Completed attachments will be deleted within 24 hours.

[SAGE] The effectiveness of bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in the management of class III skeletal malocclusion in children aged 11–14 years compared with an untreated control group: A multicentre two-arm parallel randomised

Best Answer

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Enthusiastic users today

[SAGE] The effectiveness of bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in the management of class III skeletal malocclusion in children aged 11–14 years compared with an untreated control group: A multicentre two-arm parallel randomised Copy

Best Answer

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Enthusiastic users today

[SAGE] The effectiveness of bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in the management of class III skeletal malocclusion in children aged 11–14 years compared with an untreated control group: A multicentre two-arm parallel randomised